AIC vs. AGESCI: waiting [NOT] decision


Three days of full sunshine accompanied the insights, discussions, projects, voting of the 35th general meeting Annual Legislative Association which was held in ( ), 1 to 3 May 2009.

In particular, our group was very important for an important decision regarding the Memorandum of Understanding between the ' (Italian Association ) and ' . The decision concerned the end of the long, very long indeed, experimentation that the AIC has done so far within those groups who, like us, you are bet on this adventure!

The end of the trial would have brought the beginning of a new course within the AGESCI ... But virtually no motion about it has been approved and now so do not expect the implications very clear!

What will become of our coypu??!?
"Grunc grunc" they would say!

the three motions prensentate but not approved:

Agesci and the Italian Association Castorini: not approved any of the motions and proposals concerning: the first decision not to renew the cooperation protocol between Agesci and AIC and not accept in the experience of Agesci castorismo, the second hypothesis integration of the castorismo in Agesci; the third to continue the experimental within AGESCI. We must now consider how to continue following expiry of the Memorandum of Understanding between Agesci and AIC.

comments to you ....

Author: Hector Musmeci
Group 4 Agesci Acireale

VN: F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 6.0 / 10 (1 votes cast)
VN: F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
based on 1 rating AIC vs. AGESCI: waiting [NOT] Decision 6.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating
Share

3 comments so far »

  1. carlo

    am on December 8th, 2009 @ 22:34

    Comments ...

    I find it wrong not to have reached a conclusion ...

    Ie: burning bridges with the bad and focus on our problems AIC.

    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 votes cast)
    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)
  2. Antonella

    am on December 26 2009 @ 01:30

    I want to ask Charles: "What do you know the AIC method to be so drastic in your comment?" I mean, have you ever done business in a "colony", you read a few lines of the methodology, you have an inkling of the training? ??? In my opinion, a good and constructive criticism can be done just by knowing who is critical is not it?
    We are not traders who must advertise products for sale ... we do volunteer having fun, do not forget ... this is not a "war"!
    Antonella crunk

    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 votes cast)
    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. carlo

    am on December 26 2009 @ 12:33

    I acted as steward to a field training, and even that was enough (since the aic documents for training - regulations, etc.-is careful not to make them public) have a confrontation with the chiefs camp and understand that there ' is the faintest idea of ​​scouting in bp: the proposal is simply un'annaquamento scout, to remove children from the clutches of their parents for a few hours.

    Constructive criticism?
    Here is one: let's leave the castorismo, method blank and non-educational (they are too small), and to concentrate on staying afloat scout groups that already exist.

    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 5.0 / 5 (1 vote cast)
    VA: F [1.9.14_1148]
    Rating: 0 (from 2 votes)

Comments RSS · TrackBack

Please enter your comment

Name: (required)

E-Mail: (will not be published - required)

Website:

Comment:

Immagine CAPTCHA
Change image
*


I want to be updated on any changes to the article without leaving any comment for now

Subscribed